Sure, yes. But there is a reason nature doesn't make many two headed animals...in the end there has to be a tie breaker sometimes. My point above was that it should be based on comparative advantage. The sex that cooks more should have slightly more say in what the family eats for dinner, for example. The same with the income.
Sure, yes. But there is a reason nature doesn't make many two headed animals...in the end there has to be a tie breaker sometimes. My point above was that it should be based on comparative advantage. The sex that cooks more should have slightly more say in what the family eats for dinner, for example. The same with the income.
Sure, yes. But there is a reason nature doesn't make many two headed animals...in the end there has to be a tie breaker sometimes. My point above was that it should be based on comparative advantage. The sex that cooks more should have slightly more say in what the family eats for dinner, for example. The same with the income.